- Why is political vetting so important?
Political
vetting is so important because it allows you to understand your
candidate, beyond what is just at face value. For instance, Sarah Palin
was supposedly the picture perfect vice president. She was a republican,
a mother, a governor with astronomically good approval ratings;
everything was flawless. However, they essentially appointed her as a
figurehead, rather than a representative. This isn’t to say that they
didn’t expect her to take part in policy decisions, but that they
appointed her because she looked good. This ended up yielding horrendous
consequences, as she basically went rogue and decided to pursue a
campaign completely separate from McCain’s. Her radical ideas even
forced McCain to denounce many of the things that she said, specifically
the ad hominem attacks on Obama. This proves that, without proper
vetting, candidates that seem promising often end up being bad choices.
Without Palin in the equation, John McCain probably would’ve had a much
better chance beating Obama, and maybe even would’ve pulled out with a
victory.
- Compare Sarah Palin’s level of knowledge to that of Mike Pence or Donald Trump...is it a fair comparison?
I
believe that it is a very fair comparison, especially when talking
about Donald Trump. Mike Pence is a terrible human being and his policy
decisions are horrendous, but that shouldn’t be mixed up with
intelligence. Pence is relatively smart, especially when compared to
Trump. Trump, on the other hand, has had a rise very similar to Palin’s.
Trump had almost no political experience, yet rose to the top of the
ranks based on charisma and fear mongering. He didn’t need knowledge
about politics because the audience he was appealing too had no
knowledge about politics. This is similar to Palin, as she was appealing
to those who were uneducated and fearful. The way that she gained
supporters was by making illogical and unwarranted claims about Obama
that generated terror among the general population. The only reason why
Trump was successful and Palin wasn’t was because McCain had a very
different audience in mind, and it was almost as if she was running
against the candidate whom she represented. That is, Palin essentially
attempted to take the presidency away from McCain by reconstructing
policy positions, and this basically led the entire campaign to
implode.

No comments:
Post a Comment