![]() |
|||
By now we have all heard
the story of the 49ers quarterback who did not stand up with pride to the United
States flag and our national anthem. Colin Kaepernick claims he did so because,
“I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that
oppresses black people and people of color.”
Everyone from my Uncle Steve to all kinds of NFL players have been
putting in there two cents about Colin’s stand (or lack there of), some in
support and some criticizing Kaepernick for his lack of patriotism. Chicago
Tribunes The sports correspondent for the Chicago Tribune David Hough, has
neither an argument in support or disapproval of Colin’s view. Instead he makes
the argument for the 1st Amendment. He argues that it is more
disrespectful to the flag to tell Kaepernick that he must stand rather then the
action of not standing himself. The first thing that our founding fathers
wanted the citizens of the United States to know is that in this country you
have the freedom to declare what you believe. The main point of David Hough’s
article is that we can all state our opinions and express them as we see fit.
Colin Kaepernick has as much right to protest the egregious mistreatment and
oppression of people of color by sitting down to the American flag, as others
to criticize him for doing so.
We should all care about protecting freedom of
speech in America because when Donald Trump tells Mr. Kaepernick to “find a
country that works better for him” he is saying to all of America that opinions
that question the workings of America are not welcome. Even though freedom of speech,
expression and assembly are promised to all citizens, our track record is far
from perfect in this regard. When John Lewis lead the peaceful March on
Washington protesting the inability to vote, he was met with brutal beatings
meant to deter them from perusing their rights promises them as citizens of the
United States. In the end, the 1st amendment supports the ideal that
I can believe whatever I want and so can you, and further - we can both say
what we believe.
Should there be any
restrictions or exceptions to free speech in America? If so what would they be
and how would they be enforced? If not explain why
(direct threats and violent protests are
crimes and not considered to be “speech”)


I think that there should be no restrictions on free speech because it would be impossible to enforce the rules on every single person. Thus everyone would know that they could get away with it and do it anyway. Also what would happen if a little kid broke the free speech restriction, would you send them to jail? No. -Emma Ringstad
ReplyDeletethis is very interesting, especially as how much media attention and controversey surrounds this debate
ReplyDelete